🔗 Share this article

The Australian batsman evenly coats butter on the top and bottom of a slice of plain bread. “That’s the key,” he states as he lowers the lid of his toastie maker. “There you go. Then you get it crisp on each side.” He opens the grill to reveal a toasted delight of ideal crispiness, the bubbling cheese happily bubbling away. “So this is the trick of the trade,” he announces. At which point, he does something unexpected and strange.

At this stage, you may feel a sense of disinterest is beginning to cover your eyes. The red lights of elaborate writing are going off. You’re no doubt informed that Labuschagne scored 160 for his state team this week and is being eagerly promoted for an national team comeback before the Ashes.

You probably want to read more about cricket matters. But first – you now grasp with irritation – you’re going to have to sit through three paragraphs of light-hearted musing about toasties, plus an extra unwanted bonus paragraph of self-referential analysis in the direct address. You groan once more.

Marnus transfers the sandwich on to a dish and walks across the fridge. “Not many people do this,” he remarks, “but I personally prefer the grilled sandwich chilled. There, in the fridge. You get that cheese to harden up, go for a hit, come back. Boom. It’s ideal.”

The Cricket Context

Alright, let’s try it like this. Shall we get the sports aspect initially? Little treat for your patience. And while there may still be six weeks until the first Test, Labuschagne’s century against the Tigers – his third this season in all cricket – feels quietly decisive.

Here’s an Australia top three badly short of performance and method, revealed against the South African team in the WTC final, shown up once more in the following Caribbean tour. Labuschagne was left out during that trip, but on a certain level you felt Australia were desperate to rehabilitate him at the earliest chance. Now he appears to have given them the perfect excuse.

Here is a strategy Australia must implement. Usman Khawaja has just one 100 in his recent 44 batting efforts. Sam Konstas looks less like a first-innings batsman and rather like the attractive performer who might portray a cricketer in a Indian film. Other candidates has made a cogent case. McSweeney looks finished. Harris is still surprisingly included, like unwanted guests. Meanwhile their leader, Pat Cummins, is unfit and suddenly this appears as a surprisingly weak team, lacking authority or balance, the kind of built-in belief that has often helped Australia dominate before a ball is bowled.

The Batsman’s Revival

Step forward Marnus: a world No 1 Test batter as just two years ago, recently omitted from the 50-over squad, the perfect character to return structure to a fragile lineup. And we are advised this is a calmer and more meditative Labuschagne these days: a simplified, fundamental-focused Labuschagne, less intensely fixated with small details. “I believe I have really stripped it back,” he said after his hundred. “Not overthinking, just what I need to score runs.”

Clearly, nobody truly believes this. Probably this is a rebrand that exists entirely in Labuschagne’s mind: still endlessly adjusting that approach from morning to night, going deeper into fundamentals than anyone has ever dared. Like basic approach? Marnus will spend months in the nets with trainers and footage, exhaustively remoulding himself into the simplest player that has ever existed. This is just the trait of the obsessed, and the trait that has long made Labuschagne one of the highly engaging cricketers in the game.

The Broader Picture

Perhaps before this highly uncertain historic rivalry, there is even a kind of appealing difference to Labuschagne’s constant dedication. For England we have a team for whom technical study, let alone self-analysis, is a kind of dangerous taboo. Go with instinct. Stay in the moment. Live in the instant.

On the opposite side you have a batsman like Labuschagne, a player completely dedicated with the sport and wonderfully unconcerned by others’ opinions, who observes cricket even in the gaps in the game, who handles this unusual pursuit with exactly the level of absurd reverence it requires.

And it worked. During his intense period – from the instant he appeared to replace a concussed Steve Smith at Lord’s in 2019 to around the end of 2022 – Labuschagne was able to see the game with greater insight. To tap into it – through absolute focus – on a higher, weirder, more frenzied level. During his days playing English county cricket, teammates would find him on the day of a match positioned on a seat in a trance-like state, literally visualising all balls of his time at the crease. Per the analytics firm, during the early stages of his career a surprisingly high proportion of catches were dropped off his bat. In some way Labuschagne had predicted events before anyone had a chance to affect it.

Current Struggles

Maybe this was why his performance dipped the point he became number one. There were no worlds left to visualise, just a unknown territory before his eyes. Furthermore – he began doubting his signature shot, got trapped on the crease and seemed to misjudge his positioning. But it’s all the same thing. Meanwhile his mentor, Neil D’Costa, thinks a attention to shorter formats started to weaken assurance in his positioning. Positive development: he’s recently omitted from the one-day team.

Surely it matters, too, that Labuschagne is a man of deep religious faith, an religious believer who thinks that this is all predetermined, who thus sees his job as one of reaching this optimal zone, no matter how mysterious it may look to the mortal of us.

This approach, to my mind, has always been the primary contrast between him and the other batsman, a instinctive player