🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.